Once upon a time in American history, it would have been unimaginable to think of online poker or any gambling would become mainstream, but USA poker sites are now everywhere. Gambling was seen as something done inside the house or in more extreme corners of the world; it developed into something the public saw as something only lower-class people did. It had no place in popular culture. This same attitude also existed in India, where gambling was not always seen in such high regard. But in the past twenty or so years, those attitudes have diminished, and online poker has been emerging as something which needs to get expanded on instead of closed off. This attitude has been changing in the societal scene, among the cities of these nations, and in the political space. Politicians once fought to ban gambling outright in both countries; now, politicians are looking for the acceleration of online poker.

Below we will look at slotxo what constituted these changes and how they differ and relate.

What led to the changes in attitude?

You don’t have to look too far into these countries’ history to see moments where they both look at online poker as a hindrance or something that needs to be controlled rather than expanded. But along similar timelines, both countries are heading toward expanding online poker. This change in attitude can get attributed to several reasons.

1. Liberalization – While religion is still dominant within these two countries, religion is no longer the main thought regarding governance. These countries now feel they have more of an open mind regarding the country’s direction. While it may not be able to veer too far in either direction, they no longer have the one dominant constraint of religion on their minds.
2. Tax revenue – when you open your country to new things, you have a new source of income. A government aims to make money from all sources. If you expand online poker, more companies will open, and more companies will have to pay various taxes to the government. These are companies and tax revenues that otherwise wouldn’t exist if online poker gets kept in the shadows.
3. Societal acceptance – People in these countries may not have hated the idea of online poker, but maybe they didn’t know about it or thought the only way to go about poker was in person, whereas now you can play on the real money usa poker sites found here. Once people learned about online poker, they began to accept it as time passed. As politicians are representatives of their respective constituents, it only makes sense if the country’s people are more accepting of online poker, and so will the politicians.

How do these movements differ or relate?

Of course, these two countries are different in population, political structures, and even the relevance of religion within the political space. However, there are a few things to keep in mind regarding these two countries differing and relating in their view and approach to introducing online poker within the market.

Similarities

• Despite having different starting points, both countries are moving rapidly to open the door to more online poker arenas.
• Both understand regulation is vital in these industries, so both countries are looking to put certain roadblocks for these businesses.
• In India and the U.S., it is up to the states to determine the overall outcome of gambling. Some states allow online poker in America, while others still consider it illegal. While the federal government has a say, like in India, where particular gambling is unlawful, they are not the ultimate deciders.

Differences

• Religion holds much more weight in India than in the U.S. Hinduism and Islam play a big part in Indian society, and even though the religions do not guide the government, it still has an effect. Especially when reminded each state decides its fate regarding this conversation. Due to religious beliefs within a state, some states may withhold expanding online poker.
• India has further to come, as their internet and online poker access is recent. Due to the sustained growth of America, they were exposed to not only the internet but online poker sooner than in India. This access to the internet means they have had more time to adjust their population to the new realities, and people have had more exposure. It’s the opposite with India, which only recently got most of their country’s internet access, so they have further to go building the infrastructure to allow online poker even to be a thing within their borders.

Online poker has grown in popularity for the past few decades, and the U.S. and Indian economies have been developing, especially in India. Countries are always involved and grown, so it only makes sense that two societies, one thought less of gambling, are now opening their minds to new possibilities. The politicians of a country are supposed to represent the will of the people, and the will of the people has been slowly drifting toward the acceptance of online poker, and thus politicians need to adjust too. Each country will be on a state-by-state basis. Still, the tides are turning, and the economic benefits to each state seem apparent, so it may be only a matter of time before online poker is a legal entity in all states within the borders of these two countries.